University of Florida Homepage

Meeting Minutes (2011-2012)

List of Meeting Minutes


BGSA meeting, 20 January 2012

Agenda

  1. Grad Forum
  2. Grad Committee
  3. Foundation Funds
  4. Budget
  5. Elections

Grad Forum

  • Goal of grad forum is to foster communication between grad students in department
  • Open format for sessions: practice presentations, workshops, experimental design discussions, etc.
  • Held in 221 Carr (old Botany Library), Fridays, 12-1pm
  • Gaby passed around sign-up sheet, will also send out doodle for sign-ups
  • Martijn mentioned that Career Resource Center presented at Graduate
    Student Council about their services & it might be good to have them come present a workshop at Grad Forum.
  • Everyone agreed & Gaby/Martijn will work on getting this scheduled

Grad Committee

  • lots of concern about how the changes in implementation of policies on time-to-completion will change culture of department, especially in relation to side projects, collaborations & other efforts that aren’t directly part of a thesis/dissertation
  • suggestion to compare requirements/metrics/tracking methods at other large public institutions that are comparable to UF
  • agreement that a BGSA meeting with the Grad Committee would be good to improve communication between grad students & faculty on what’s happening (François will contact grad committee to make arrangements)

Foundation Funds

  • the special funds that were discussed in the fall will be applied as follows:
    • $2,000 towards student travel awards (not sure if this means more awards or larger awards)
  • $1,000 towards a new grant for interdisciplinary projects
  • $2,000 towards Riewald/Olowo grants
  • unclear if these funds will supplement existing funding, or these funds will replace current funding
  • Budget

    • Earned $930 from t-shirt sales (didn’t sell any mugs), so this covers two years of BGSA Riewald/Olowo & URAP funding

    Elections

    • discussion over how to increase participation
      • self-nominations vs. peer nominations: conclusion was to have both methods, but peer nominations must be confirmed by nominee
      • talked about splitting some jobs fall/spring, to allow those who have lengthy field seasons during one semester to still be involved
      • issue is reps to faculty committees need to be for whole year
      • most positions that could be shared already have two or more people
      • descriptions already include info on time commitment, but should publicize this more, since wide range of time commitments
      • publicize BGSA achievements to let everyone know that BGSA positions make a difference
    • discussion began focusing on fostering “community building” and communication to increase ties within department
      • Grad Forum newsletter: Gaby will compile notes & committee will
        distribute
      • “stall wall” sheet: single page published weekly or monthly that is posted in restrooms: concern about whether this is permissible; when done in past, improved participation (e.g., Grad Forum)

BGSA meeting, 6 September 2011

Top of the page

Seminar snack

Seminar snacks are a huge amount of work

  • each lab rotating assignments, instead of BGSA committee
  • faculty agreed, but apparently forgot, but have been reminded
  • faculty working out procedure for rotating

Snack & soda store

Snack & soda store earning money, but not bringing in as much as we
should.

  • tracking inventory for one semester (beginning & end) to see if it’s worth to continue running it
  • suggestion: email department w/status & let everyone know that we may have to eliminate store
    • reminder that we’re missing money
    • Francois & Jess will send to both museum & bio lists
  • discussion of price change to $0.75/item: decided to hold off on changing prices until after evaluate inventory this semester
  • put sign up thanking for supporting research
  • coffee: currently space committee task, suggestion to switch to Keurig, but concern about being environmentally wasteful. Decided that coffee pot will be provided, but not coffee

URAP Awards

  • research awards for undergrads doing posters/talks at research day
  • encourage undergrads presenting research
  • suggested small prize, e.g., $25 gift cards or something
  • 1 for talk & 1 for poster + “Honorable Mentions”
  • $50 (talk), $50 (best poster), $25(honorable mention poster), see how it goes this year
  • Gift card to Amazon, since can use for wide variety

Fundraising

  • Designing t-shirt &/or mug
  • explore option of working with Jamie to find someone from Art dept. to design.
  • pre-orders for the bulk of the order
  • Daniel presented his (& Julian’s) idea of DNA w/diff. ecosystems in each loop, very favorable response
  • Caitlin has a graphic designer friend who might be willing to do it, will check
  • goal is having these ready before Christmas
  • Francois confirmed that mug & t-shirt came at top of list on survey done in past
  • email coming out by early November

Extra money from department

  • one-time deal
  • not large, but fairly substantial (~$5,000)
  • department is giving SIGNIFICANTLY less in travel funds than in the past
  • departmental travel awards can be used for research, CLAS only for
    conferences
  • Options discussed:
    • more/larger Riewald/Olowo awards
    • more/larger travel awards, research or conferences was the concensus
    • multidisciplinary projects for collaborative research projects?
    • grad student retreat
  • will have vote on options
  • committee for awards via same mechanism as Riewald/Olowo?

Rustom Antia’s visit

He arrives Sept. 24, leaves Tuesday

  • joint with EPI
  • Itchetucknee trip on Sunday
  • doodle will be sent out
  • not sure if grad students will have vote or not, but will find out

Grad student progress letters

  • started tracking progress much better last year
  • letters going out indicating that status in program may be in jeopardy
  • letters go out annually
  • concern is that this policy is being applied to senior students in mid-stream
  • feeling is that decisions would have been different if the tracking
    had been going on from the beginning
  • providing updates isn’t the problem, but some students feel that the implementation is severely flawed & causing excess stress
  • having a discussion with the grad committee & grad students might be
    helpful
  • request for face to face meeting with grad committee/coordinator, not
    just via email, perhaps after report to administration is done in November
  • proactive checklist for each year

 

Top of the page